You're right. It will always be as good as it is now. I guess I'm speaking from a personal point of view. I don't think 6 megapixels is sufficiently hi-res for much of my work. So, while I might like to have an *ist D to play with now, I would want to replace it as soon as a higher res model is available. But perhaps I'm being unfair.
John Francis wrote: > > > > if I had spent $1500 on a camera that will undoubtedly be obsolete in > > less than a year. > > You reckon? What's going to obsolete it, then? > > And even if Pentax *do* come out with a new model (which I don't > believe will happen) what's going to be wrong with the *ist-D?
