> Just done a series of 16X12 prints for a friend on Ilford Gallerie Smooth
> Gloss. WOW. You could knock me down with a feather. The paper quality is
> superb and the pics GLOW. Apologies - I don't often use caps. It really
> is stunning stuff. Epson just lost a customer.
>
> The Pearl is nice but not altogether my cup of teaearlgreyhot.
AFAIR you print using a Canon S9000, right? If that's true, I can only hope
that the Smooth Gloss is more "archival" trhan the Pearl - I use a S900, and
my prints on the Smooth Pearl faded after a few days laying in a room - no
direct sunlight. The black ink turned red :-( Canon's Photo Pro paper wasn't
that much better in that respect. since then, I've switched to
Tetenal-Fine-Art-Something-Matte and Epson Heavyweight Matte Paper - they
offer much more stability. My 2 cents.
>
> [snip]
>
> Just proofreading all that, why don't I just post the jpeg!
Duh! :-) (no dissespect meant)
regards,
Lukasz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===================================
www.fotopolis.pl
===================================
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
