Hallo, nice test. It seems, that the 24-90 is overall a very good performer, far better than the 18-35 at 24. The color is a bit blueish, at 24 it is the sharpest lens, even better than than the FA2/24. Also at 90 it give very good results compared to the others.
I think the reason is, that the 24-90 is already developed as a digital lens. It was developed as a standard lens for the MZ-S-Digital which was canceled. regards R�diger - Von: Dario Bonazza 2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >So I ended up trying several old and new lenses on the *ist D. A wide >selection of results is visible here: > >http://www.dariobonazza.com/t04p7e.htm > >http://www.dariobonazza.com/t04p8e.htm > >http://www.dariobonazza.com/t04p9e.htm > >http://www.dariobonazza.com/t04p10e.htm > >I won't comment here, as any comment can be misunderstood, brought off topic >and so on. Just see the pictures and then decide by yourself which lenses >are good or bad, which are up to your expectations and if the *ist D is >worth such lenses (or the other way round). > >It took me almost all the day to shoot, select and compare images, then crop >details and put everything together for publishing. I do hope someone will >appreciate that stuff. > >Thanks for your attention. > >Dario Bonazza >
