Wouldn'y those glass bricks in the wall behind the people be highly reflective? That could reaaly fool a flash.
Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458-8878 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/05/03 07:28PM >>> ... and here is the link: http://www.xdstech.com/istd/underexposed.asp arnie ----- Original Message ----- From: "arnie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 6:50 PM Subject: Re: ist d underexposure > well the worst case of the underexposure was on a wide shot, but the > background was not white. i'm going to upload the pictures to my site. i'll > post the link when its up. > > arnie > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andre Langevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 11:46 AM > Subject: Re: ist d underexposure > > > > >I am using the ist D with the 360fgz, and all my indoor pictures are > > >terribley underexposed. anyone have a similar experience? or know of a > > >solution? > > > > > >quite disappointing to spend $1525 and get a broken unit (if thats what > it > > >is) > > > > > >arnie > > > > If white (or clear) walls were a big part of the picture (wide angle > > lens), it is normal and you need to compensate. I bet a photo of a > > person taken with a tele lens from the same distance would be fine, > > as skin and clothes would fill most of the frame. > > > > Andre > > --
