Well, Paul,

M3's aren't going to be affected by digital. They're 40 year old mechanical bodies with no meters. If on-board meters, ttl metering, auto-exposure, auto-focus, etc, hasn't brought the prices of them down, why would digital? <vbg>

Personally, I'd love one, though. But, for the difference in price between one of those and an early M6 (maybe a non-ttl one?), I'd pony up the extra cash for the latter.

LX prices do seem to be coming down a bit, though. It was hard to find one for under $600US until recently. Several have gone for around $500US or even as low as $400US.

cheers,
frank

"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer




From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Used LX Pricing in Europe
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 21:37:40 -0500

I looked at Leica M3s today on ebay, hoping I could find a bargain. Nothing for less than $600. That's not exactly tumbling. Ditto the prices on Pentax 6x7. There are no LX near the top of the list right now, save a broken body with no finder. That one is at $188 with 16 hours to go. I know the Pentax folks just bought their digital cameras in the last few weeks, but that didn't change the whole photographic world. Remember, everyone else has been buying digitals for a couple of years now. Prices are about the same as they were before the *ist D -- believe it or not.

On Thursday, November 6, 2003, at 08:51 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:

Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Wholly Mackerel! It gathered 25 bids and still only got up to �112?
Hard to believe!
Yes, I hope a PDMLer got it too!
Mine cost me 4 times that much (!) and I still think it was a reasonable price...

Yep. Prices on cameras are tumbling.


--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com




_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963




Reply via email to