I occasionaly use a Tamron2x times teleconverter with a Pentax F*300/4.5.
That setup is probably asking a lot from autofocus, but I still try anyway.
On a slightly overcast day, I cannot focus at all with the PZ-1P (mine is
actually a Z-1P -Canada). It just hunts back and forth, so I have to
manually focus. The same with my MZ-3.
My *ist locks on right away. On one slightly over cast day, I took the
converter, lense and *ist to a camera store and they let me take an MZ-S
outside so I compared it with the *ist. With people walking down the street,
the *ist picked them up right away. The MZ-S had a little trouble but after
about a second, it focused on them. I tried both in the servo/continuous
mode and also in the single mode. Both held the focus on the walking people
in servo mode. I didn't have film in the camera, and in hindsight I probably
should have so I could view the pics to confirm. But anyway, I have had good
results with the *ist (but maybe slighty overcast gives more light for
autofocus than inside a mall in your test)
Greg Cooper

----- Original Message -----
From: "David S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 12:00 AM
Subject: SAFOX VII vs SAFOX VIII


> My newest body is the Z1-p & I would like to get another body with
> improved autofocus for moving subjects.  I am thinking about getting an
> MZ-S but am concerned about the thought of Pentax totally discontinuing
> aperture rings on all new lenses.
>
> I took the FA* 200/2.8 & F* 300/4.5 IF lenses to a local camera store
> for a comparison between the MZ-S & *ist bodies with those lenses.  The
> *ist did not seen to track people walking in the mall as well as the
> MZ-S, I think this might be due to a weaker AF motor in the *ist.  Has
> anybody done a field test comparison between AF capabilities of the MZ-S
> & *ist, or MZ-S & *istD?
>
> Does anybody with inside Pentax info know if Pentax will be soon
> releasing a higher end film based body then the *ist?
>
> --
> David S.
> Nature and wildlife photography http://www.sheppardphotos.com
>
>

Reply via email to