I agree with Dave in principle but, looking at the photos that we chose to put in my high school yearbooks ( I was on the staff), anything where one can kind-of recognize the subject is probably good enough. :) I can't imagine now, some thirteen years later (yes, I'm THAT young), what the heck we were thinking printing some of those photos. And where was the faculty advisor?
Perhaps you can find something on the used market to suit her needs. Cory Waters ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Miers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:29 PM Subject: Re: Tamron > I've never done a lot of sports photo work, but my first reaction is that > that sounds like kind of a slow lens for what might be low light conditions. > I've also always heard that rule of thumb is usually a max of 200mm for hand > held. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gary L. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax Discuss Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 3:41 PM > Subject: Tamron > > > > Does anyone have any "hands-on" with the Tamron 90-300 f/4.5~5.6 AF lens? > > > > Looking at one for my grand daughter so I'm not looking to spend a ton > > but do want something that's decent enough to use for sports photography > > that may end up being used in her school annual since she is on the > > Annual Photo Team. > > > > All comments, thoughts, and help will be appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > -- > > Gary > > > > > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.538 / Virus Database: 333 - Release Date: 11/10/2003
