rg
Ryan Lee wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "alex wetmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm personally happy with the smaller chip size and lenses. I'd rather have smaller and lighter lenses. I'm very happy with the performance of current APS-sized sensors with regards to noise and pretty happy with their resolution.
Yup.. I suppose my observation is that Pentax is like a mother bird coming back to feed a nest of squawking chicks with only so much worm to go round. If the mother feeds the skinniest to help it grow (probably not the case in real life.. I bet they brutally let the runt die in very economical manner) While some might be content with APS sized sensors, more demanding (and fatter..35mm fat to be exact) chicks sense the neglect and squawk louder.. (Please excuse the analogy..possibly obtuse to rational people- I blame it on midnight madness.. a sign I've been awake a bit too long)
As long as there are cameras with the smaller sensors it makes sense for the DA lenses to exist.
alex
I agree with this totally. I give them points for identifying, and tending to this market, but if Canon unveils a full frame CCD in a 300D price range a bit too soon, it'll be a disaster for Pentax if they've committed too much to this APS sized sensors and lenses etc.. If Pentax decides to have a bit of foresight, they might have a ears up trying to find out whether Canon will follow suit with DA type lenses or is trying to tame full frame, because it does seem to have implications for Pentax eitherway. How long will DA last? I give it 2 years.. 3 optimistically.. but who knows :)
Regards, Ryan

