on 20.11.03 9:01, Heiko Hamann at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yes, I do. But I have to admit, that I don't like it as enthusiastically > on the *istD as I did when I used it on my MZ-5n. Why? I prefer 35mm > instead of 53mm ;-) Overall the FA35/2 seems to be a very good performer > on the *istD but there isn't this aha experience that I had when I saw > my first tack sharp pictures taken with the MZ-5n. > > But I'm quite sure that I have to get more experienced with the *istD > and its lens combinations before I can judge this reliably. I've noticed (well, to be honest actually I 've been using it with *istD for two days only) that it performs very good on *istD except for chromatic aberrations - these has been higher than with FA 24-90 (as a matter of fact 24-90 has shown the least of these interferences among my lenses, perhaps because it has been really made with MZ-D in mind...)
-- Best Regards Sylwek
