Hi there Mike!

Many thanks for your suggestions.  The primary reasons I have never taken to
processing
my own films are aged 12 mths, 4 and 6.  (Yep, the 12mth old is the reason
for my
"disappearance" from the list, sorry guys, if I didn't fill you in on her
impending arrival at
the time!).  The need to lock myself away in a dark room for many hours at a
time, is just
all too difficult - my 4 and 6 year olds would succeed in trashing my house,
killing each other
and painting the walls with vegemite.  However, working on the 'puter is not
such an issue
as I actually get to WATCH them trashing my house, killing each other and
painting the
walls with vegemite!  Also, with young kids in the house, the idea of lots
of chemicals in
vicinity isn't too appealing.

I have on many occasions however, considered at least developing my own film
and just scanning
the negs.  At the moment I do all of my work in Photoshop (usually scanned
from 5x7s), upload it
via ftp to my pro lab and then they send it out to me.  I don't think I
would ever actually consider
printing them myself, the ftp works really well, and the results are lovely.

Have just had a guy really pushing for me to use his lab, by offering really
cheap roll scans
(18mb files and using Digital ICE) with processing. This all sounds great to
me, as it is less scanning
for me and I am forever fighting with my scanner to keep it dust/finger
print free.  HOWEVER, the luxury
of having a digital body where it comes straight from the camera,
eliminating all need for any scanning, is
just all too inviting.  It is all a matter of $$$$ and quality though, and
whether I need those Elinchrom Monoblocs
more than I do the D-ist.  Then, as I am sure you have all discussed in my
absence, it also raises the issue of
lens compatibility/focal lengths, and I am not sure if I am ready to change
my entire collection just at the moment.
I have a few new favourites that I am really enjoying playing with at the
moment.

Mind you my ever-expanding behind would probably appreciate the Monoblocs,
as I seem to
really be wearing a good seat into my computer chair these days....




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: An observation re Pentax for sale


Hi,

Tanya Mayer - Photographic Artist wrote:

>
> Also, my nearest photolab is 3 hours away and currently I send EVERYTHING
> away, which to a very impatient
> woman, is an absolute nightmare.  Digital, in this instance, would be
> absolute bliss.

Why do you not process your own?  At the most, �200 for a Jobo processor
and tanks to process up to five at a time.  �15 to process 10 C-41 36exp
films.  Probably cheaper if you are buying inquantity and tax
deductible.  Or you could go the whole hog and buy one of the Jobo ATL
series autoprocessors.

If you go digital you will, in your situation, be spending more, not
less time in front of a screen and you will need to invest in a high-end
printer (or digital minilab) to create the output.

mike

Reply via email to