Well, now that you mention it, I ~was~ wondering about that "Photographic Artist" bit... <vbg>

BTW, hi. I've been active on the list for several years now, but I faintly recall that you may have been around, perhaps during my lurlking days, or possibly when I first started posting. In any event we certainly didn't get to "know each other" at all. You'll very quickly realize (if you haven't already) that much of what I say is tongue in cheek, and pretty much always to be taken worth a grain of salt. The odd salient point accidently slips through from time to time, but I'm working on keeping those to a minimum. (Hey, that's two salt metaphors in successive sentences. Not bad, eh?)

So, pleased to meet you. It seems from some of the other welcomes that I've read that you were quite popular poster in your day <g>. Everyone seems quite happy to have you back.

cheers,
frank
"Rider of Bicycles"

"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer




From: "Tanya Mayer - Photographic Artist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: An observation re Pentax for sale
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 08:42:24 +1000

OT- my apologies to you all - I just noticed that all of my posts are
showing
"Tanya Mayer - Photographic Artist". In this context, it looks extremely
pompous and conceited! lol. I subscribed to the list using my work email
addy, and forgot that that is the display I have for it! Sorry guys, really,
I am not totally full of myself... I promise.... *hides head sheepishly*...


;-)

tan.x.

----- Original Message -----
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: An observation re Pentax for sale


Hi,


Tanya Mayer - Photographic Artist wrote:

>
> Also, my nearest photolab is 3 hours away and currently I send EVERYTHING
> away, which to a very impatient
> woman, is an absolute nightmare. Digital, in this instance, would be
> absolute bliss.


Why do you not process your own?  At the most, �200 for a Jobo processor
and tanks to process up to five at a time.  �15 to process 10 C-41 36exp
films.  Probably cheaper if you are buying inquantity and tax
deductible.  Or you could go the whole hog and buy one of the Jobo ATL
series autoprocessors.

If you go digital you will, in your situation, be spending more, not
less time in front of a screen and you will need to invest in a high-end
printer (or digital minilab) to create the output.

mike


_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963




Reply via email to