Tanya,

If you are considering lots of wedding work, you may want to stick with the
PZ-1p.  Two reasons come to mind.  First, a second or backup body that
operates and feels *exactly* like the main body allows you to fully
concentrate on the job at hand, rather than fiddling with the differences.
This includes both controls and meters.  You get to *know* a camera over
time and to trust it.  The second reason is because of the fill flash/flash
compensation capabilities.  Wedding shots can always use a twinkle in the
eyes of the couple - even in broad daylight.  This is one place that the
PZ-1p shines.  Flash synch up to 1/250th and flash compensation at -1.5 ev
is just about right.  It makes sure that there are no shadows hiding the
eyes and puts a catchlight in the eyes.

I would look around and see if you can find a used PZ-1p  - who knows, with
all this LX enabling going on, maybe one of the list members would be
willing to part with theirs.

Good luck,

Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tanya & Russell Mayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 2:04 AM
Subject: Subject: Introduction to ME! :-)


> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:39:53 -0800
> From: "Ernest Alejandria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Introduction to ME! :-)
>
> Tanya Mayer wrote:
>
> <snip>
> >is in regards to the Pz-20.  Is anybody familiar with this model (I
> > >believe
> >that it was released in '94 and
> >discontinued in '95)?  I know that it is only a fairly basic model, but
>I
> >have had one offered to me for a
> >good price and I am genuinely interested in the "hyper" mode function
>that
> >it offers.  All  comments
> >and advice would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Welcome to the group, Tanya. I'm not too familiar with the camera in
> question but since you already owned a PZ-1p, I assumed that the "hyper"
> mode of the PZ-20 would be equal to or less than that of top-of-the-line
> model. So at best, purchasing this camera would just buy you redundant
> capabilty. Good luck and let us know what you decide.
>
> Ernest Paulo
>
> Thanks for your welcome Ernest, and also for your advice.
>
> I think that maybe I should have rephrased my enquiry about the Pz-20.
> I guess I am primarily wondering if it operates in the same way as the
PZ-1p
> and if anybody could possibly elaborate on this and the other features
that
> this
> camera body has, I would be most appreciative.  Also, I am wanting
> to purchase something similar to the Pz-1p in weight and ergonomics, but
> can't afford another Pz-1p at the moment (hopefully when the MZ-S comes
> out, they'll go down in price), so thought that the PZ-20 might be a good
> compromise.  I have found that my MZ-50 is basically useless with my
> collection of lenses (which are all used k mounts), with exception of
course
> to the sigma 28-80 that it came with, and the p30t can be a little
limitiing
> at
> times with its slow maximum shutter speed - thus! i need yet another new
> body
> (yes, i really do NEED it - well, so I tell my husband anyways!).  At this
> rate
> though, I will be not only building a darkroom in our new house, but also
a
> room
> just for storing my cameras in, hehe, maybe we should buy the kids some
bunk
> beds
> and they can share a room! Oh, such an expensive interest we all have here
> (but a good excuse to shop!).
>
> :-D
>
> Tanya.


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to