Thanks so far, what about the K 18/3.5? Is it the dark horse in the trio? Peter
>Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> A 15/3.5 - Big, Expensive honker that rarely leaves the house or >>> gets out of the case. Light loss at the corners wide open... >> >>> A 20/2.8 - In the camera bag with the LX and 2 Limited lenses (43 >>> & 77). Smaller than it looks, and seriously wider than a 24mm >>> (plus much smaller than the FA24/2.0). Very nice picture >>> qualities. >> >>I basically only have to add an "Amen" to what Bob has said. The A >>15/3.5 is a gorgeous (and amazingly) rectilinear ultra-wide, but >>doesn't travel too often (only if I know I am going to need it for a >>particular shot). On the other hand, the superb A 20/2.8 is almost >>always in the travel bag - it's easily my most-used wide-angle. Both >>lenses are among Pentax's finest lenses, I would say, but differ >>considerably in portability. > >I'll second what Fred says except that I seem to carry my K15/3.5 around >a lot more often. I'll often take the 15 plus the FA*24/2.0 and the >FA*80-200/2.8 as a three lens kit. > >-- >Mark Roberts >Photography and writing >www.robertstech.com
