> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raimo Korhonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 December 2003 11:56
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Vs: Sigma 24-70 vs Tamron 28-75 XR Di
>
> I have no experience of either lens but IMO 24 mm is very
> usable focal length. (And the 3.5-4.5/24-90 Pentax is an
> excellent lens.) All the best!
> Raimo
> Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
>
> -----Alkuper�inen viesti-----
> L�hett�j�: Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> P�iv�: 14. joulukuuta 2003 12:30
> Aihe: Sigma 24-70 vs Tamron 28-75 XR Di
>
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm considering buying one of the following 2 lenses & I would be
> >interested in opinions for / aginst:, especailly from PDML
> memebers who
> >have first hand experience using these lenses or preferably had the
> >opportunity to compare them. I currently shoot with an MZ-S
> and I hope
> >to get the *ist-D sometime in '04, so I want a lens that
> performs well
> >both with a the *ist-D as well as the MZ-S.
> >
> > Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX Aspherical DG DF
> > Tamron SP AF28-75mm F2.8 XR Di
> >
> >Would like to buy the FA* 28-70 F2.8 but can't afford it :-(
> >
> >Rgds
> >
> >Patrick
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
