Thanks for the comment Tom! 'Tis good food for thought. Actually I do have some small graphic elements in mind - the table cells on either side of the Title are place holders for large picture thumbnails. But those won't fundamentally change the basic layout that you object to...
BTW, I would be interested to see what the site looks like on your screen. If you have time and interest, I would like you to take a screen shot, save as .jpg or .pdf, and email that to me (offlist obviously). Stan on 12/16/03 3:08 PM, graywolf at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Stan, > > I want to go on record as saying, "I don't like it much". > > Why is my opinion different from the others? > > Well, it looks like something a techno-dork would produce. There is no style, > no > graphical feeling to it. At that level I prefer plane text. I dislike the > windows look of it immensely. Of course, as you say, you are kind of stuck > using > WYSIWTGY (what you see, is what they give you) software. > > The above, of course, is only my personal opinion; but I never went along with > the crowd just to be popular, and would rather report my honest feelings about > it. > > -- > > Stan Halpin wrote: >> I have been (slowly) working on my new web site design. I am, as always, >> frustrated that my WYSIWYG code generator (Adobe GoLive 5) doesn't always >> yield pages that look like what I laid out. Anyway, some fiddling to do, but >> the basic design is fairly well set. >> >> See http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/A_20-2.8.html >> for a sample page. None of the links are active, this is a one-page sample. >> Let me know if you have any comments....
