[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> We may not agree whether a Super Program should be lumped with an ME Super
> and Program Plus. But we all can agree that a Super Program is a Super A by
> another name. And an MZ-5 is a ZX-5. Etc.
Perhaps. But we don't agree on whether an ME/SE should be grouped
with an ME, am MZ-5n with an MZ-5, . . .
Keeping the tally lines separate loses no information - you can still
add the MZ-5 and ZX-5 entries if you want to.
> Or are you suggesting that someone might choose a Super A over a Super
> Program to get it in black?
No. I'm suggesting that the approach Albano takes is the simplest
case, and avoids most pointless arguments as to exactly where to draw
the line between bodies that are 'obviously' the same, and bodies which
are 'obviously' different. If you want to group entries, go ahead.
But Albano publishes just the raw data, as reported by the owners.
Currently the list doesn't differentiate between black & silver models.
--
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Silicon Graphics, Inc.
(650)933-8295 2011 N. Shoreline Blvd. MS 43U-991
(650)932-0828 (Fax) Mountain View, CA 94043-1389
Hello. My name is Darth Vader. I am your father. Prepare to die.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
