I have just had to wipe my hard disk, and rebuild my system, as it was
attacked by some nasty virus. It was done like many of the jokes I regularly
receive, it subject 'Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs - The real story'.

***Watch out****
Just  Dooon't open the attached file, it is leathal to your Hard Disk, and
can't be reversed once the Spider Web shows up on your screen (Usually
around a week from infection).

Neddless to say I have lost all my emails, especially the ones concerning
the Ricoh **10 camera Kit, Please can you forward those emails again.
James

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: fisheyes (was Re: Pentax wish list)


> On 22 Mar 2001, at 23:53, tom wrote:
>
> > I guess there's two schools of thought on this in regards to short
> > lenses. One says there's so much DOF that any small focusing errors will
> > be covered. The other school says there's so much DOF it's hard to see
> > exactly where to focus.
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> I own a CZ Hologon for the AF-G camera, it is the only non-AF lens in the
> line-up and is scale focus only, it isn't coupled to the electronic RF
although
> you can take a distance reading from the G body. The lens is fixed at f8 I
> have always just guessed the focus distance and I have never been
> disappointed with my focus decisions and I am quite critical of myself :-)
I
> find the 16mm reasonable to focus and wonder how much an AF system
> might hunt when using an ultra-wide in less than ideal conditions?
>
> > This is true when you're doing close-ups. For normal photography with a
> > macro lens, AF makes sense. In fact it's pretty cool in the case of the
> > FA 50/2.8. I'm willing to bet that it's the fastest AF'ing lens in the
> > lineup.
>
> Sure, what I have noticed when using my Macro lenses at long focus
> distances is that even though they are relatively slow compared to their
non-
> macro counterparts the focal plane sometimes seems more apparent than
> when using faster lenses.
>
> > What are you using to remap? I saw a Quicktime 5 demo a few weeks
> > ago...instead of a cylinder model, it's a cube now. You can look up and
> > down.
>
> Check: http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/fisheye_to_rectilinear.html
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rob Studdert
> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> Fax +61-2-9554-9259
> UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
>

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to