yes rob, i can remember days when we used to use such old fashined information recording devices. of course then if your off by one number your test results are reversed, and because you have no feedback you need to take many more pictures of that dont walk signal. all in all more work than i'm actually interested in doing. here i went out and 5 minutes and six pictures later, i had my answer.
i'm not saying it cant be done, only i wouldnt have done it. arnie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 5:51 PM Subject: Re: another istD issue > On 28 Dec 2003 at 8:16, arnie wrote: > > > yeah, if i had to wait for the film to develope, i would never remember > > which ones were taken with or without the filter, hence there would've been no > > test. > > Well there is this old fashioned set of devices, a writing stick called a pen > and a note pad. Combine them add a little intelligence and you'll have all the > details recorded. Lens testing and problem solving like this didn't happen only > since digital arrived. > > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 >
