Hi Boris.
I cannot answer in respect to the Fuji,as i have never used it,but,on the Tmax 3200 i
can
offer an
opinion as i have use this several times.
I have used both the Tmax and the Ilford 3200 and i find the Kodak just a bit less
harsh
with the
grain,especially if you have some diffused light to work with.Both seem to give similar
grain under
arena type lights(ie hockey arena etc).If i want a lot of grain for pub type band
shots
i'll go with the
Ilford.I think the Tmax 3200 at 4x6 prints will be fine.
Dave
Oh i quess i should add i usually wind up shooting it at 6400 and this may add to the
grain,but for band
shots grain is good:-)
> Hi!
>
> So, finally here is the question <g>: what is better: Kodak TMAX 3200
> or Fuji Press Pro 1600 scanned and turned b/w digitally?
>
> One last detail, the resulting shots are going to be 4x6 unless I
> manage to produce something they'd ask me to enlarge.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Boris
>
