Hi, Frits W�thrich wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 22:52, mike wilson wrote: > > Frits W�thrich wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 20:08, mike wilson wrote: > > > > I think the "nature" of the restriction Paul is talking about is nudity, > > > > of Homo sapiens at least. > > > > > > > Yes, I understand that, but I didn't find anything in the submission guidelines > > > about such a restriction. > > > > It's an unwritten one that has been been (very subtly) broken at least > > once. If the basic presumption is that most "art" nudes are terminally > > naff and most "glamour" nudes are unbearably derogatory to women, I, for > > one, don't have a problem with the restriction. Especially as that type > > of photography is difficult to avoid in many other forums on the > > internet. > > > > mike > I have no problem with the restriction, but why don't we have that in the guidelines? > -- If I remember correctly, the guidlines refer only to technical matters of file presentation. Subject matter was (has been regularly) discussed on the list but, so far, it has not been deemed neccessary to write guidelines for it.
mike
