Hello Jeff, I'm going to be doing a bunch more testing of the AF400T. Seems to overexpose, but consistently. I'll try the mentioned shooting at 400 ISO along with exposure compensation. From my first tests, seems that I will probably end up just using exposure compensation once I nail down how far over the exposure is. Another option is to use the sensor on the flash and just use Auto mode.
Anyway, I'll post my findings. -- Best regards, Bruce Wednesday, January 7, 2004, 1:36:20 PM, you wrote: JJ> I have also noticed that my Sunpak MZ-440AF just completely overexposes JJ> everything when attached to my *istD. I was beginning to think something JJ> was wrong with it. I've used it with my PZ-1p, and ZX-5n with no JJ> problems, in fact been very happy with it. Shot a couple of weddings JJ> with it in fact... I only have one other TTL flash for Pentax, the JJ> AF220T and that seems to do a slightly better job, but it isn't very JJ> spanky. I want to get the AF360FGZ, but I'll hold off if people think JJ> there's a real firmware issue that needs to be solved. Of course Pentax JJ> has never been speedy at anything, so I wouldn't count on a firmware JJ> upgrade any time soon... Unless we all begin flooding their mailboxes JJ> with complaints about TTL flash exposures... JJ> I think tonight I'll try out my 285HV and see how that does. Does JJ> anybody think that's a bad idea? I know they've had some voltage issues JJ> in the past, particularly with the 283, but mine is a fairly new 285, JJ> and I've used it successfully on my PZ. JJ> Thanks, JJ> Jeff Jonsson JJ> Marriott Library, University of Utah JJ> 801.585.5587
