On 9 Jan 2004 at 17:09, mapson wrote: > Did anyone find a significant difference in quality between TIFF, RAW and > the 'best' JPG while using *istD?
TIFF and 'best' JPG are very similar in quality, the TIFF has the edge in quality (but only if you intend to make extensive modifications to the image). The penalty is a file size of around 7 times larger than the equivalent JPEG. The RAW convertor definitely generates TIFF and JPG files of an inferior quality to the camera when you compare edge detail, this needs to be fixed. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
