Hi, Bob W wrote: > > Hi, > > > Thanks, Frantisek. That site didn't come up with Gurgle, probably > > because I put the year in. There were a few "portrait" style pictures > > but, on the whole, the reportage seemed to be perceptive and human. > > Neither of which are attributes I would assign to UK reportage, in > > general. > > ! > > you're looking in the wrong places, Mike! >
No, you are 8-) There is some excellent reportage here but there is also a huge amount (proportion) of dross. It's also almost totally subjective.... mike
