You can find a rudimentary form of aggregating images per photographer in the PUG directory link. Displaying them as a mini-gallery with thumbnails, as well as searching by equipment / content requires a dynamic site - no question about it. There already is a database of photographers and relative URLs to images I maintain for the directory purpose. A dynamic site distinct from komkon could be a solution even if not the best. Otherwise the komkon maintainers stated clearly they do not agree with dynamic pages generated on their site.
Servus, Alin John wrote: JF> I don't really think we need to move from komkon, as long as komkon JF> are happy for us to be there (and our bandwidth needs are met). JF> One thing I would like to see, though, is more flexibility in the JF> way viewers select the images. At present it's a "by month" display. JF> I'd certainly like to be able to select all the images by one JF> photographer (and possibly even more than one). It might even JF> be nice to have a way of selecting images by equipment used; JF> how often do we see people asking for examples shot with a JF> particular lens, and being pointed to a PUG image? JF> Note that this kind of functionality could be provided from a JF> different site, if needs be. But it would be better if it could JF> be closely integrated with the PUG, just to simplify the collection JF> of the metadata.
