True, yet you passed judgment without an explanation. So, imo, it's not a critique, just an opinion. And there's nothing wrong with expressing an opinion, nothing at all. In fact, you yourself note that your comments were just an opinion.
BTW, thanks for you far more in depth critique ... <LOL> shel Christian wrote: >And If you notice from Shel's origianl post, he was not >directly asking forcritique or opinions on his picture just the text. > > I let him know that the font and text read fine on my monitor and then, as a > free (YES FREE! as in NO CHARGE TO YOU!) service, I provided an honest > opinion of my response (both physical and emotional) to his picture. He > should be thanking me for such a valuable service! ;-) > > Christian > OK, here's a "critique" of Shel's picture: The color, texture and > composition gave me a headache and made me nauseas. ;-) > For rain-through-the-windscreen shots, my favorite so far was in a PUG > gallery a while back. I'd send a link along but the PUG is dead... <snif>
