Funny, I cropped it on the right side and on the top, and thought "I would have liked 
a bit more of that sink"... :-)

Lasse

From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> Needs cropping on the left side.  The sink is distracting.
> Bill
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 3:02 PM
> Subject: Re: As usual: photo advise sought
> 
> 
> > Now, I feel bad. I did not think I was criticizing Boris's photos. He
> aked, I
> > though, for help in improving his photography in the future. I thought I
> > addressed that very thoroughly in fact giving what amounted to a free
> class in
> > advanced photo techniques. Now it seems that all that I should have done
> was
> > say, "Very nice".
> >
> > I guess, I wonder, does anyone apperciate my efforts here? Or should I
> just
> > figure all folks are doing, in cases like this thread, is sharing their
> > snapshots and shut up?
> >
> > Well, I will share one of my snap shots. It is related to this thread
> because it
> > is an indoor flash shot. I scanned it to see whether it was worth
> retouching the
> > scratches. Scanned from a 8x10 work print, and downsized for the web. The
> print
> > is a bit more contrasty than the jpeg.
> >
> > http://www.graywolfphoto.com/presscameras/temp.html
> >
> > --
> >
> > Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> > > Hi Bill,
> > >
> > > And I agree as well.  Only thing is, Boris keeps asking what everyone
> else thinks, and there are a lot of opinions here, including the
> > > opinion to not pay attention to other opinions <LOL>
> > >
> > > Bill Owens wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>I agree whole heartedly with Lon.  Unless you're shooting for pay, shoot
> to
> > >>suit yourself and to hell with anyone else's opinion.  If you're happy
> with
> > >>your results, it shouldn't matter what someone else thinks.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -- 
> > graywolf
> > http://graywolfphoto.com
> >
> > "You might as well accept people as they are,
> > you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 


Reply via email to