Jeff Jonsson wrote: > To my eye, the FA* 24 is actually displaying more chromatic abberation > than the A/24. Am I wrong?
And lower sharpness at f/2.8. Dario > Rob, a sample (center and edge) is published in my *ist D test: > http://www.dariobonazza.com/t04p11e.htm > > Browsing is slow now, maybe the web's got some problems today (or is it > just my ADSL provider?). > > Dario > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 2:11 PM > Subject: *ist D A24/2.8 vs FA24/2 comparision? > > > > Has anyone compared the performance of the A24/2.8 and the FA24/2 on > > the > *ist > > D? > > > > I'm not all that fussed with the size and the chromatic aberrations > (toward the > > image the edges) when it's used on the *ist D. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Rob Studdert > > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > > >
