On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:05:35 -0800, Jim Apilado wrote: >Sometimes I wonder if those shooting digital would like to see the era of >film end ASAP.
I wouldn't. Digital is not good enough yet to replace film completely. It will one day, I know that. Unfortunately people are getting used to lower quality in all things because it's a more technological solution and therefore "MUST" be better. For the time being I get better quality from my MZ-S and Kodachrome than I do from the *istD. For a lot of things though I don't need that and I must admit that digital has all but replaced my neg shooting and I have an MZ-S sitting around with little to do - I'm not getting rid of it yet, sorry to those who suddenly saw a bargain. I'm also throwing images onto 2 CD's and testing them before removing them from my hard drive - disk 13 currently being filled. Leon http://www.bluering.org.au http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
