Motherland Sweden? Before Finland Aland belonged to imperial Russia.
"Most of nowadays so called micro states are very prosperous." Yes, and Aland 
developing to the direction of a tax haven is no exception.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho

-----Alkuper�inen viesti-----
L�hett�j�: Lasse Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
P�iv�: 01. helmikuuta 2004 0:25
Aihe: Interesting OT: Aland and Finland (wasRe: * ist DigitalQuestion)


>From: "Raimo Korhonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Actually it was given to Finland by the League of Nations.
>
>That is correct. This was in June 1921, after Finland, having put the Aland Islands 
>under military occupation, had declared that she wouldn't comply with any decision by 
>the League of Nations, other than one which forced Aland and the Alanders under 
>Finnish sovereignty, and that Finland, if she wouldn't have her way, would rather go 
>to war to get it.
>(You could even say that it was England who by her influential position in the League 
>of Nations gave Aland to Finland. If the wish of the Aland people would materialize - 
>what possible consequences would such a precedent carry with regards to the British 
>Empire, and not only to the Irish question.)
>
>> There was no referendum but prominent Alanders were of the opinion that Aland 
>> should be given to Sweden and of course Sweden had nothing against it.
>
>It's true that there was no formal referendum, as we know it today. The reason for 
>this was that Finland, subjecting Aland political leaders and spokesmen to political 
>harrassments and illegal imprisonment, wouldn't allow the Alanders to conduct one, 
>under threat of imprisoning those who asked for an internationally supervised 
>referendum.
>
>However, the Alanders did cast votes. In June of 1919 96% of those casting their 
>vote, by signing their names to a petition, voted for Aland to return to it's 
>motherland Sweden.
>
>Present day Finnish history legend on the Aaland Island Question bears similarities 
>to the Soviet-Russian history legend regarding those states which were forced under 
>Soviet rule. The Soviet history writing basically said that only "fascist" elements 
>opposed the free will of the people of those countries to join the Soviet Union.
>In Finland they say that only "some prominent Alanders" didn't want Aland to become 
>Finnish, when in fact 96% voted for Sweden and against Finland.
>"Anything but Finland" declared the Alanders before the League of Nation. Even 
>independence, although they knew it meant the greatest economic difficulties.
>
>>Now it is a demilitarised area with quite extensive autonomy.
>> Last time there was a poll about the matter the majority preferred to stay with 
>> Finland - no doubt because it is financially beneficial.
>
>Whether it is or not, is a matter of debate.
> 
>> The idea of an independent state with a population of a major village - 25000 - is, 
>> well ... interesting. 
>
>I completely agree with you. Most of nowaday so called micro states are very 
>prosperous.
>
>Lasse
>
>> All the best!
>> Raimo
>> Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
>> 
>> -----Alkuper�inen viesti-----
>> L�hett�j�: Anders Hultman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> P�iv�: 31. tammikuuta 2004 19:17
>> Aihe: Re: Using multiple cameras and formats (wasRe: * ist DigitalQuestion)
>> 
>> 
>> >Stan Halpin:
>> >
>> >>Right. But If I say Aland, who but you and Anders would know what/where
>> >>that is? If I just say Sweden, I am insulting Aland.
>> >
>> >I'd think that would be more insulting to Finland than to �land, 
>> >actually, since �land formally is part of Finland and not Sweden, 
>> >even though historically �land has had closer ties to Sweden.
>> >
>> >Sometime in the early 1900's, a referendum was held on the island, 
>> >where the inhabitants voted to belong to Sweden, but Finland claimed 
>> >it anyway.
>> >
>> >Lasse, what is the current status on that? What do you �l�nningar 
>> >think nowadays?
>> >
>> >anders
>> >-------------------------
>> >http://anders.hultman.nu/
>
>


Reply via email to