> > But the digital camera fanatics, instead of seeing the > thread as a discussion about PHOTOGRAPHY, and the > desire/need (real or perceived) for more images delivered > faster, and reducing the quality of photographs, saw it as > an attack on their precious pixels.
Perhaps that's because you aimed your criticisms at digital photography, not at 21st-century photography. Not that aiming at 21st-century photography would have been any more accurate, either - the same old arguments have been levelled at 35mm vs. medium format, roll film vs. sheet film, and probably at sheet film vs. wet plates.
