I agree that over $50 is too much for the much maligned Takumar (Bayonet)
135/2.5.  However it was my "go-to" portrait lens as long as I wasn't
shooting into the sun.  It's not as soft as some people will make you think
I paid $25 for mine in perfect condition and would be willing to spend $35
on another one in similar condition.  You should have said "Don't waste more
than $50 on this lens."

People who mis-represent their auctions anger me. Fools who pay too much for
a any item can only blame themselves for not paying attention to the
details.

Christian

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: Takumar 135mm f2.5 K mount lens - identifying


> Last week there was some talk about how to identify this
cheap-but-cheerful lens.  The issue is making sure to pay UNDER US$75 for
this lens versus the much higher priced, high performing K-mount 135mm f2.5
with the 58mm front diameter.
>
> Here are some recent auctions from ebay:
>     (forgive me if I gore anybody's Ox)
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2983676025
>   described as a Pentax-M 135mm f2.5...but see writing at front
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2983711784
>   described as Asahi Pentax 135mm f2.5...see excellent pictures
>   (you can clearly see Takumar (bayonet) inscribed around the
>   front rim & multi-colored f-stop markings in the 2nd picture)
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2984988454
>   described as Pentax K 135mm f2.5 ...but see pictures
>   (last shot includes the 52 mm front filter)
>
> I'm surprised that folks are paying over $50 for this lens because it
isn't that good.  It's not labled Pentax because it doesn't have the SMC
anti-reflective coatings on the glass.  It is visibly inferior to the Pentax
M-135mm f3.5 which is plentiful and cheap.
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2983729213
>   pictures show SMC Pentax-M 1:3.5 135mm around inner lip
>
> So don't waste your money chasing the non-SMC Takumar (bayonet)
>
> Regards, Bob S.
>

Reply via email to