Some of us think the control layout of the 5/5n/3 is the best
thing about them. It is the only AF camera with a traditional
control layout. So you think Pentax should toss them and the
unique segment of the market and make another me to camera? I
think at least some of us hope not, we want an MZ-S with a MZ-3
control layout. But, for what it is worth, most of the camera
dealers here in the states seem to agree with you.
--Tom
Rob Brigham wrote:
>
> If I was Pentax (which I am not), I wold be doing the following:
>
> MZ5n/MZ3 replacement with control layout/body styling of MZ-7, and new
> autofocus (Safox VII). The 5 & 3 are a bit dated in style and do not
> fit the current MZ lineup very well. I know the marketing people
> currelt call this 'retro', but I think that is more of an excuse for
> being out of date rather than a design goal.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
