Shel, It was just an example of film saving an image of an event the importance of which isn't realized until later. Where as Digital probably would not. Lighten up.
At 01:16 AM 2/10/04, you wrote:
One needn't use Bill Clinton's sexual exploits and personal affairs to justify film.
Jim Apilado wrote: > > Saw a piece on ABC News (U.S.) about how some valuable images might be lost > to history because of digital. [important clinton details deleted] > So there is justification for film after all.
I drink to make other people interesting.
-- George Jean Nathan
