i don't understand why the scanning program should make any difference. they
are using the same TWAIN drivers and that controls what goes into your
program. i have all of the programs and plugins you name and Grain Surgery
is pretty good at removing noise, but it's on the expensive side. NeatImage
is cheaper and better in some ways. Digital GEM by ASF is good at some
things and not so good at others. you can read all about noise reduction at
http://www.michaelalmond.com/Articles/noise.htm.

Herb...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Miers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"[EMAIL PROTECTED] Co" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:32 PM
Subject: OT: Grain Surgery for PS


> Possibly of interest to those scanning your film.  I recently acquired a
> copy of Grain Surgery for Photoshop.  I have been primarily using PSP 7
> instead of Photoshop because of grain issues while scanning.  I"ve not
> perfected my use of this yet, but preliminary results seem quite good.
Much
> better then anything included with PS 7.  I've heard that PS CE I think
it's
> called comes with better grain tools, but don't have the pocket change to
> update yet.  Has anyone else used this plug-in, and if so what are your
> findings and or suggestions?


Reply via email to