Well, I did not try it with each to an eye, but at the GFM Camera Clinic last year I checked out the Pentax Rep's sample *istD, and TV's 10D. The viewfinder image in the *istD was quite noticeably larger. Enough so that if I could buy a digital SLR the Canon would not even be in the running to me.

--

Cotty wrote:

When Jostein last visited and I got a hands-on with his *ist D, I tried a
*very* interesting experiment.


*ist D with 28-70mm on, and D60 with 28-70mm on. Set the focal lengths
the same on each camera (both were f/2.8 lenses) and held each one up to
both of my eyes together. That is, *ist D to one eye, D60 to the other
eye, both in portrait orientation. It was easy to hold the cameras to
view with same scene in a tungsten lit room at night.

What struck me was: I did *not* perceive any appreciable difference in
the relative sizes of the image. The Pentax viewfinder seemed a *tad*
bigger, but just on the edges of perception. Not like it was really
obvious. Bare in mind that the *ist D CCD and the D60 CMOS are not
identical in size, so the dreaded 'effective focal length multiplier'
(what ever that is) is 1.5 on the *ist D and 1.6 on the D60.

I was anticipating a much brighter view in the Pentax over the Canon, but
I did not see that.

I would love to try this with other DSLRs...


--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com

"You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway."




Reply via email to