Re: Reala rated at 80

[graywolf]

The old (pre 1959) indexes were about 1 stop lower, though some pro films were 
only raised 2/3 stops. On that basis I would say you will always be safe with a 
1 stop over-exposure on amateur films, and a 2/3 stop over-exposure on pro 
films. Beyond that I would suggest careful experimentation to see if it works 
for you. Also realise you will need to redo those experiments if you change 
labs. Very seldom though is there any reason to go more than 1/2 stop, except 
for needed exposure compensation.

--

Boros Attila wrote:
This sounds interesting for capturing shadow detail. But how much shuld I
overexpose for that? As I understand 1/3 stop is just safe for any film, but
the effect varies. Does somebody know how this works for ordinary Fuji
Superia 100 (not Reala)? And more exactly how much is "a lot" for you? How
far can I go on the safe side?
SP>In case of negatives by underrating ISO you avoid problems with
SP>underexposure. Most negatives give enlarged grain effect when even
slightly
SP>underexposed.
This is scary... I should better follow Peter's advice and overexpose all my
negatives!
Attila


--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway."