A scroll of mail from Cameron Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 01 Apr
2001 13:19:41 -0700
Read it? y
>I didn't mean to impune the dignity of the 80-200 2.8. It is gorgeous; it's
>also really expensive and very heavy. An f4 would make more sense.
Personally, I think a non Power Zoom version would sell quite well.
The FA* is very expensive when compared to third party alternatives
and far bulkier. Don't get me wrong - it's one of my favourite
lenses, but I need to have a reason to bring it along, I'll never
carry it 'just in case' like I will with a 400/f.5, 100/2.8,
28-70/f2.8, etc. It's as bad as the 55/3.5 for the 6x7.
dave
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
