I agree with pretty much everything Mr. Robb said, and he said it better than I could have.

I like it, though, for it's strong composition. Quite the spectacular sky - it would have made a good PUG from Clouds month (if you had the shot then).

cheers,
frank

"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer




From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Lake Michigan wetlands
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:37:21 -0600


----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Sorenson" Subject: PAW: Lake Michigan wetlands


> Never thought I had anything good enough for PUG postings, but PAW got me > out of *lurker* mode. Constructive criticism appreciated. > > http://home.earthlink.net/~allaround6/washingt.htm

I like the composition, but it is oversharpened rather a lot, and
makes the cloud more blown out than it needs to be.
I would really like to see what this one looks like with less
sharpening.
A detail that I like is the highlights on the bottom left, as a
counterpoint of sorts to the opposite corner.
The picture has some nice lines and texture to die for.
The Mackie line between the trees and sky is really distracting.
I think less sharpening would soften this to the point it was no
longer an issue.
If you shoot stuff like this a lot, you might want to consider
dumping colour in favour of black and white, and small format for
medium or larger format.
And film.
This scene type dies in digital.

William Robb





_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca




Reply via email to