John
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:21:54 US/Eastern, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Mark.
Yes i just reread my post.I did not describe that just right.
I was wondering what,if any,distortion,was in the finder,like the type you would see if
you had
transitional zoom glasses(like me)and if you move your head side to side you get a
distorted,fuzzy
view.
My D1 and D2h have almost 0 distortion if i move my eyes around the finder.The PZ-1 has a
tremendous amount.
If its like the later,i doubt i''ll look at it.
Thanks again Mark
Dave
> I've used the *ist-D with the Sigma 70-200. I like the lens with film andlike it just as well with the *ist-D.
In regards to the finder - it's adequately bright, I guess I'd put it
roughly on par with my Pz-1p. As for barrel distortion - I don't know that
I've ever noticed that in terms of the finder itself on any
camera. Wouldn't that be something determined by the lens?
- MCC
At 09:12 AM 3/2/2004 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Just wondering,anyone of the *istD owners use the Pentax 80-200
> f2.8 or the
>Sigma 70-200
>(210??)f2.8 on the camera yet.Comments of image qualiy,especially the later.
>Also what film camera can you liken the viewfinder to in terms of
>brightness,information
>and barrel
>distortion.The later my main worry.
>
>As always,thanks in advance
>
>Dave
-----
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
http://www.markcassino.com
-----
-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
