Are you serious about the K20mm f/4 being lousy? I've seen a bunch of nice comments about it. I'd always assumed that they weren't readily availible for the same reasons that the A* lenses are not readily availible--Pentax didn't sell many and people are hoarding them.
If it is that bad (and if the M is likewise bad) I can see why the A 20/2.8 goes for so much even used, and it pretty much leaves me with the FA 20/2.8 as a worthy option I guess I wouldn't be surprised if K and M 20/4 are not spectacular. Nikon made 3 inferior 20mm lenses before finally getting it right with their 20/2.8, and these would have been rougly contemporary with the K and M lenses. >From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Ya just missed a couple. I sold two K20/4.0's in the past few weeks. >Wish >I'd have known you wanted one ... it's really a dog and I was glad to be >rid of 'em (Bow-Wow) >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> First off, can anybody tell me why it appears to be impossible >> to find an M or K 20mm f/4? DJE
