Trademark and copyright are different things.

John

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:39:34 -0600 (CST), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, do you know why they chose BSD rather than Linux for the basis of OS X?
 >
 > I'd suggest that it has to do with Nextstep, which was the previous
attempt to put Mac over unix.  Apparently there are a lot of extensions
to Unix underneath OSX prefaced with "ns".  Linux is sort of a mismash
of SysV and BSD unix, with more SysV in general, so it might not have
worked as well for apple as pure BSD.
>
It may also have to do with the fact that Linux is distributed under the
GPL and copyright to Linus Torvalds, both of which may have been some
legal issue somehow.

To be totally accurate, Linux is copyright to all the people who have
ever contributed to it, of whom Linus Torvalds is obviously one.

Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds and no other, I believe.
He is still the originator, and the first and only maintainer and definer
of what is the linux kernel.


Presumably WindowsPDQ is not copyright to all those guys in Redmond, but
to the corporate entity? I'm told that the guy who invented post-it notes
got something like a $300 bonus, 'cause he worked for 3M.


DJE





-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/



Reply via email to