> Well, I did a fast modest tweak, going by what you, >Dave, said you were looking for. >However, It got a bit contrasty - too much for your taste?.
No not at all.The trees,sky and grass are more "punchier" than on my attempt.Looks closer to the slide. > Anyway, it's here alongside your (resized) original. I can upload and add versions by the other volunteers as they post them to me and I'm at my computer. So what did you do as far as tweaking. Do you use the RGB or do you adjust individual channels with level curves and or colour adjust.?? I think i tend to use the over all RGB part of the phot.Maybe i should start adjusting/looking at the individual ones then.?? > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=381606 > > I suggest WOW-pictures be sized at max 800 pixels long and preferably att max 100 kb. (The ones now posted are inadvertently bigger in pixel size.) Sorry,my mistake.I sent a bigger size feeling it might help having more data to the scan.I'll resize in the future. Dave > > Lasse > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > FYI i have sent one picture to those who have expressed an interest in helping a digitally > > challenged > > Canadian(well scans anyway)lol > > > > Thanks for the help. > > Dave > > > > See below. (I also reiterate the idea of WOW as in > > previous messages.) > > > > > > From: "Lasse Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > You pick one of your pictures (one that you typically had > > difficult> ies in gettng right), > > > > > fresh out of the scanner - send it in a reasonable size to a number > > o> f volunteers on the > > > > > list (I'll be one of them) who will do their finishing and > > adjustment> s according to their > > > > > taste (no competition). > > > Thanks, > > > Lasse > >
