I would vote for some more detail in the shadow areas on the lower left. There's such a large area of pure black that the left figure seems to just melt into the corner, sort of flattening out. I think that as the eye moves from left to right over the dark area, it goes too long without any visual cues to form a gestalt, so you are left with the impression of the lower left corner just being a flat black area. You don't need much in there - just a few visual cues that it's not all black (which I suspect can be coaxed out of the negative) and the left figure would pop back out of the corner.
Nonetheless, fantastic image!
- MCC
At 05:27 PM 3/6/2004 -0500, you wrote:
I was a bit late on week 3. Now I'm a bit early on week 4. Oh well.
"The Kiss" was taken by Shel (and likely thousands before him), but I think it would have been a good title (have I whetted your appetite yet? <g>).
So, I settled on "Haley's Ring", a title that I hope raises more questions than it answers:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2188556
I'd really like to hear your comments on this one.
Okay, Albano, the "right" body, and this time, "the right brand" of lens, okay? <g>
cheers, frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Premium with Virus Guard and Firewall* from McAfee� Security : 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines
-----
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
http://www.markcassino.com
-----
