>>If the LX was conceived in the K era and took a while to >>develop then the fact that it isn't M sized makes sense. >>DJE
>Even if the LX had been finished a litle latter, in the M era, to >make it smaller would have been impossible. >Andre Knowing Pentax, they'd have tried! If you are used to the Nikon F2 or FM2 the MX looks rather impossible. Olympus managed "pro" cameras in a very small body (OM3, OM4) albeit with somewhat later technology. Nobody else has really made a small "pro" SLR which does suggest it is difficult. DJE
