On 9 Mar 2004 at 18:16, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > I dont understand why you guys cant see that with a given, > fixed, lpmm of resolution, even the very best primes, unless it > is infinity, the cropped APS image will be less detailed than > the FF image. Very simple. And as the sensor's Mp gets bigger, > the difference between FF and APS will get even greater.
All that I understand of sampling theorem is undermined by your suggestions. What I am saying is any difference WRT to resolution in each case will generally be so small as to be insignificant particularly if we are talking prints as the final output medium. Very simple. > The other thing mentioned before is that for a given Mp of sensor, > FF will outperform APS based on larger pixel area and hence lower > noise, greater dynamic range. I think we all are undeniably aware of these factors John. > Bottom line is a FF is better than > APS sensor, both sharper and less noiser, assuming Mp and lens > resolution remains the same. Sure but by what practical degree? Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
