Yeah ... there's something about the contrast and tonality that I don't like either. That's why I asked if anyone had some portraits they made using this film. After all, it could be my own fault for improperly exposing it, or the labs error, or maybe just a crummy scan on the CD.
Clint Austin wrote: > > Shel the reason I might not continue to use XP-2 is the contrast does not > look right. I dont know if the kodak brand film would be better, alot of the > blame might be on me for not using filters. Just a thought the whole folder > is located here: > http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=382221
