Paul
On Mar 10, 2004, at 6:27 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Paul,
I don't have one, and I don't use a Mac. I hope this is helpful ;-))
But a good friend does use a Mac with the newer OS, and he also uses the Epson 2200. He's happy, and believe me, were he not, I'd know about it. We did some printing at his place not too long ago, and the results were acceptable.From what I've gleaned, it's a good printer. It uses similartechnology to the bigger 9600, from which I've pulled a few prints. The 9600 was driven by a new Mac, too ... I like the results better from the 9600, but that may be because the operator runs a high-end lab, and everything is superbly calibrated and working at its peak. Rus just does his simple home stuff, doesn't use the printer every day, hasn't done as good a job in choosing and using paper stock ... still, the results are good. Ummm, Rus is using PS 7.01, unless he's upgraded in the past month or so.
shel
Paul Stenquist wrote:
My old printer is on its last legs. It's an Epson 1200 and it has
produced more than 1000 12 x 18s. It's not printing very well with OS X
10.3 and Photoshop CS. I think the drivers haven't been uptdated beyond
system 10.1, which is quite diffferent. Since it's a clunker anyway, I'm
thinking of replacing it with the Epson 2200. Is anyone using this
printer with OSX 10.3 and PhotoShop CS. Are you happy? Is this printer
due to be replaced? Is there a better printer in the $500 to $800 range
that's proven itself with PS CS and OSX 10.3?
Paul

