Re: PAW - KW's third

[Paul Stenquist]

I love this shot. The gradations in the landscape and the single 
elevator rising above the landscape are majestic. I wouldn't reframe 
it. As far as the road is concerned, it's there. It's part of this 
landscape. You could photoshop it out of there, but that would perhaps 
be somewhat of a cheat. On the other hand, as I noted before, I would 
like less green, more contrast and more brightness. Perhaps I'm a color 
junky who needs to be slapped around a bit, but that's just me. In 
violation of all photographic ethics, I minused green andpumped it up. 
It's here: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2201570&size=md
I might be just plain wrong on this, but I like it this way. In any 
case, it's a great photograph.
Paul
On Mar 11, 2004, at 5:24 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:

Bill, thanks for looking & commenting. Yep the Palouse.
There have been a few comments about the positioning and I just don't 
recall
if there was any thing to the right that might have prevented that. I 
was
expecting some comments about excluding the road in the lower 
foreground.

Kenneth Waller

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Sawyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: PAW - KW's third

The Palouse, Ken?  As usual, a great image, I'm coming to expect 
nothing
less from you. My only thought is that it might have worked "a bit" 
better
with the framing moved to include more of the land to the right of the
elevator. Just a quibble, and I might be all wet, too.  Everything 
else
works quite well to my eye...

-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 07, 2004 8:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW - KW's third
Please check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Comments - Likes/Dislikes

Ken Waller

PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com