>From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >If you think of digital as a pocketable Polaroid that doesn't cost an arm >and a >leg per print, then you can easily see the reason for the popularity to >snapshooters. Strangly enough, I know of many who never do anything but >look at >them on the LCD. When they get their 100 or minimal jpegs used up they >just let >the next one overwrite one of the others. In other words they use it as a >toy. I >think that by next Christmas a 2mp, 3x zoom, digital P&S will be under >$100, so >they are priced as toys also.
Yes, and yes. Ironically, smart shopping at someplace like KEH can get you a working older SLR and a 50/2.0 for under $100, and such a set-up has much more potential photographic ability for a serious-minded user. DJE
