i am wondering how really important is that low noise iso 1600. after all, i guess, lots of people here have been happily shooting provia/velvia/tmax/tech pan/whatever else for years... personally, i would be happy with noise-free iso 100 and low noise iso 400. some kind of in image stabilization (which i suppose adds a couple of stops) would be nice too... increasing the lattitude would be far mor important for me. as well as the pixel count and color depth, given the aforementioned noise constraints.
best, mishka
Herb Chong wrote:
yes, it is possible to all of the following. the cost might take more than 2 years, but the others within two years. i don't know if they will give lower noise very high priority though. which will they do? increasing the number of pixels would be the easiest.
Herb....
----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pdml" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:00 PM
Subject: Digital Improvements
I would like to see a FF DSLR under $2000. Barring that, bumping the APS-sized sensor to 8 mp would be nice. But what I would like most of all is lower noise above ISO 200. Is this technically possible?
